top

Fantasy Fight

November 5, 2007 by nopstar 

I typically avoid posting on fantasy fights, they tend to devolve quickly into flaming and lots of name calling. Many thanks to Jofeljoh, the moderator of the Kakutougi forums for linking to it.

It’s an interview Dekkers did with an Irish paper; you can read the full article here. For those of you who are Nak Muay’s and don’t know who I’m talking about you should be ashamed. For those of you who are new to Muay Thai, you can watch his HL video here. There is a reason his nickname was “Turbine from Hell”, the guy is about as bad ass as they come.

Anyway, here’s the quote:

Buakaw is celebrated as one of the greatest fighters of recent times, and while Dekkers rates the Thai highly, he feels that he went up against better: “I don’t think [Buakaw] is as good as some of the fighters I’ve fought. I think I would have beaten him.”

I have to say I agree with Dekkers, I think young Dekkers would have soundly beaten Buakaw. I know a lot of you are going to jump on me, I’m okay with it, I’m not going to make it a point to start these useless debates, but I would like to see what you guys think.

[poll=33]

Comments

41 Responses to “Fantasy Fight”

  1. pac on November 5th, 2007 1:13 am

    i go for dekkers win by decision, if da best of buakaw vs. da best of dekkers, it will be one of the best fights in history…

  2. Josh on November 5th, 2007 1:36 am

    I think Dekkers would win, but I don’t think he would “soundly beat” him. I train with Coban who, naturally, gives Dekkers props…but not too much props.

  3. Junior_jack on November 5th, 2007 2:31 am

    I think Dekkers will winn under Muay Thai rules and maybe a draw under K-1 rules… but who thinks about them :)

    so my bet would be Dekkers by decision! (sorry buakaw :()

  4. Khannie on November 5th, 2007 3:18 am

    I’m Irish, so had read that article before (it was discussed on Irish message boards). Good article. Good idea to post the poll here too. Dekkers is an absolute ANIMAL. Oddly, he’s not that well known in Holland (where he was born and lives), but couldn’t walk down the street in Thailand without getting mobbed. :)

    BTW…That highlight video you linked to is gone :( There’s another one available at:

    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=M3R4xtjl5b4

  5. Yaksha on November 5th, 2007 3:36 am

    Dekker by KO. Left hook of course ;)

  6. spydaman on November 5th, 2007 8:48 am

    Aiight…A lotta u know me as the president of BNHA (Buakaw Nuthuggin’ association) but I have a reasonning as to why I don’t think (prime) Dekker would win a Pure Thai fight vs (prime) Buakaw.
    If any of you guys have ever followed Dekker carreer, the man himself said on plenty occasions that in order for him to win in Thailand, he would have to KO his opponent, because Thai people judge Bouts differently than foreigners (ie. elbows, kicks and Knees score way more than punches) and even though Dekker low kicks were lethal, his punches were his bread and butter.

    With that said, Buakaw has never been KOed in his carreer, I don’t think Dekker can KO him so by default I would have to give the fight to buakaw.

    Let’s also not forget that Buakaw’s favorite weapon remains (his elbows), his kicks are lightning fast (his best weapon as far as I’m concerned) and his knees and clinch game are right up there with the best (ask K1, they changed the rules because of him) all of those weapons are what the Thai officials are lookin at.

    Dekker hates clinching, Buakaw loves it, the Thai judges love it, the thai audience loves it.

    Now if we’re talking about a fight in a different country then I would probably give the advantage to Dekker, but like I said, it all depends on the circumstances. Hope nobody thinks I’m bias, just trying to be objectif.

  7. Tong Po on November 5th, 2007 9:40 am

    You guys know that Dekker in his prime was quite a bit smaller than Buakaw. True Dekker was a terror in the ring for anyone (pure aggression, power and speed), but I just don’t see any physical advantages due to Buakaw being bigger- probably stronger physically.

  8. Stack on November 5th, 2007 9:57 am

    Buakaw due to being bigger, slicker and overall a true Thaiboxer. As long as there is a clinch and an elbow Dekkers succumbs.

  9. Gusnark on November 5th, 2007 10:50 am

    Under K-1 rules can’t make decision. There’s no clinching allowed, no elbows, Dekkers is a maniac with his hands, so he would definitely have chances to beat Buakaw. As Spydaman said, Buakaw was never KO’ed, so if Dekkers would, win is by decision.
    I would say draw under K-1 rules.

    Under full Muay Thai rules I don’t think Dekkers would win. Especially in Thailand. He would be a very tough opponent tough, but Buakaw has better legs, knees and is great in clinch. He wouldn’t allow Dekkers to use his hands by closing him into clinch. Buakaw definitely by decision. Maybe even a KO using his knees / elbows.
    My two cents…

  10. Hannes on November 5th, 2007 12:56 pm

    Dekkers by ko. Don’t think Buakaw has never met a man with that intense pressure Dekkers put on his opponents. Also, hasn’t Dekkers fought many thai’s that was active during a period in Thailand were those weapons you mention (elbows,clinch etc) was even more dominating. Thats my humble opinion.
    Flame war is unavoidable!

  11. nopstar on November 5th, 2007 1:19 pm

    Hannes-

    Flame War is totally avoidable… we can keep things civilized, this isn’t sherdog.

  12. spydaman on November 5th, 2007 1:29 pm

    Hannes, “Flame war is unavoidable!” We’ve had 10 posts so far and I haven’t noticed any flamming yet. You sound like you are trying to instiguate.

    Anyway,Buakaw is known to have had 300+ fights….It’s highly possible that he has encounter quite a few men with that “intense pressure”.

    “Also, hasn’t Dekkers fought many thai’s that was active during a period in Thailand were those weapons you mention (elbows,clinch etc) was even more dominating.”….Yes….and those are the reasons for most of his losses.

    Now people, I’m not saying that Dekker can’t win in Thailand…I’m saying that he is at a serious disadvantage there because his primary weapons are his fists.

  13. strongboy on November 5th, 2007 3:53 pm

    I agree with spydaman.
    for the same reason he mention in his last post.

  14. fight geek on November 5th, 2007 4:24 pm

    Initially I thought this was an easy decision—Deckers. In my opinion he’s a better fighter. Then I read Spydaman’s comment and I think he’s right. I don’t think Dekkers could KO Buakaw. And if it went to the score cards, Dekkers hand-oriented style of fighting would work against him (in Thailand).

  15. Deimian on November 5th, 2007 6:58 pm

    Hannes you are retarded buakaw has had more fights greater exposure to the world of muay thai than dekkers

    its like saying a guy that has 1 fight is as good and versatile as a man that has had 100 fights

  16. nopstar on November 5th, 2007 8:14 pm

    Wow… 4 comments after I ask that things not get turned into Sherdog, Hannes get’s called a “retard” well done Deimian.

  17. Reverend John S. Taylor from MMAInsideWeekly.com on November 5th, 2007 9:11 pm

    This is a full on flame war…………..sweet………..I got Dekkers 70 times out of 100……….

  18. Stack on November 5th, 2007 9:54 pm

    Based on what? Have you even seen 70 Muay Thai fights from either fighter?

  19. Reverend John S. Taylor from MMAInsideWeekly.com on November 5th, 2007 9:56 pm

    Let me dumb it down for ya……70% of the time I say Dekkers wins………..Just a thought…….It’s fantasy right???

  20. Hellraiser112 on November 5th, 2007 10:11 pm

    Buakaw!!!!

  21. Stack on November 6th, 2007 2:03 am

    Yup that’s sufficiently dumb alright.

  22. strongboy on November 6th, 2007 2:28 am

    hahahaha

  23. spydaman on November 6th, 2007 8:18 am

    Play nice people, a wise man once said “Flame War is totally avoidable… we can keep things civilized, this isn’t sherdog.”

  24. Reverend John from MMAInsideWeekly.com on November 6th, 2007 9:04 am

    Pretty sure I didn’t start this one…….

  25. Tong Po on November 6th, 2007 10:20 am

    I pick godzilla over king kong because he has more martial arts training from the japanese

  26. Reverend John from MMAInsideWeekly.com on November 6th, 2007 10:30 am

    Based on what? Have you even seen 70 Muay Thai fights from either fighter/mythical monster?

  27. Ernesto on November 6th, 2007 2:36 pm

    Speaking of Flamers.. Nice to see you Tong Po!! haha

    NOP: We doing a Xmas Gift Special Post again this year??

  28. Tong Po on November 6th, 2007 5:25 pm

    Here’s a clip of Godzilla taking on Anguiras, Rodan and King Seesar all at once. I have yet to see King Kong pull that off.

  29. alex on November 6th, 2007 5:54 pm

    baukaw in the clintch eblows and knees for ko

  30. Paul PP on November 6th, 2007 6:03 pm

    I love Buakaw but Dekkers in his prime would most definitely give BPP a good run for his money. Dekkers Decision all the way, Buakaw just has a iron chin battle tested.

  31. Gusnark on November 7th, 2007 9:20 am

    Just watched Ramon Dekkers highlights again… damn, he was a maniac. One of the best fighters ever just like Buakaw is. He was more aggressive and definitely a greater boxer. He maybe be better technical fighter, but Buakaw is better with legs and in a clinch. I go for Buakaw.

  32. Anonymous on November 7th, 2007 12:20 pm

    1) It would not be a walk in the park for either Buakaw or Dekkers. If the contest were to be held on neutral ground I’d say Dekkers at a catch weight because of his hands and constant attack nature, though he could also counter pretty good, Buakaw showed at the MAX that he could be pressured out of his comfort zone if pressed hard enough which Dekkers would surely do IMO. Dekkers on the other hand has the shark like mentality were his gameplan was rarely rattled because he just shrugged it off or on a few occasions pumped him up his aggressive nature….

    2) Sherdog’s training forums are the only reason to be on the message board, bound to happen due to the huge #’s they have.

    3)I give the edge to King Kong in both a muay thai and mma match because of his strong wrestling/ground and pound and the fact that Godzilla’s reach is only slightly better then the T-Rex he is modeled after….in a street fight though Godzilla via radioactive breath.

  33. Deimian on November 7th, 2007 1:15 pm

    I hope you stay anonymous

    taken out of his comfort zone? the man fought stupid that night obviously we can’t compare it to how he fought fopr the last 3 years the man was versatile with his kicks

    how can u say one match is as good as buakaw going to get when he has dominated people like systematically taken them apart e.g. andy souwer masato name anyone

    guys like u were saying the same thing when buakaw lost to souwer in a controversial decision

  34. Deimian on November 7th, 2007 1:18 pm

    dekkers was an amazing fighter he attacked but buakaw is at either equal caliber
    he’s not like dekker’s crappy opponents he killed he is beyond that

    it would be a close match but i say decision because buakaw uses elbows knees

    between kicks buakaw is more versatile

    dekkers would win in a boxing match but with alll these combo’s being used its a toss up

  35. spydaman on November 7th, 2007 1:22 pm

    Anonymous, your post made a lotta sense….especially #2 and #3….Now let me go back to #1….which if fine until u made this statement that kinda confuses me. Here’s the statement – “Buakaw showed at the MAX that he could be pressured out of his comfort zone if pressed hard enough” – If you are saying that the reason why Buakaw lost the fight is because Masato’s pressure was too much for him to handle, then you are DEAD WRONG. I can think of many reason as to why he lost that fight but “Masato’s pressure” is definitely not part of it..well….not IMO. I’m not trying to take anything from Masato, but I believe, IMO that Buakaw defeated himself after he got dropped.

  36. Tong Po on November 7th, 2007 3:36 pm

    Here’s the link

  37. Paul PP on November 7th, 2007 6:19 pm

    Everyone with a brain knows this, but just look at Buakaws KO ratio compared to Dekkers(

  38. nak rohp on November 9th, 2007 4:15 am

    i went with dekker ko, do think he would knock bpp out but if it went the distance, buakaw would prob take it on technique!

  39. Junaid on November 20th, 2007 5:09 pm

    …. Buakaw KO
    I dont get whats the hype with Dekker so much i understand hes a great Muay Thai fighter but come on, hes not close to being the best. Many have defeated him like Sangtiennoi, SAKMONGKOL, Coban, Dida, Gilbert Ballentine, Cherry, man it goes on. Im not taking shit from him but god are you all serious hes not undefeatable BUAKAW KO!

  40. Mr PoPo on November 21st, 2007 11:38 pm

    dekkers with his elbow

  41. Pede on December 10th, 2007 6:03 am

    It would be a great fight, if both had a good day. The result we can only dream of. It could go both ways and we will never findt out for sure. But what a dream fight.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

bottom